Sunday, January 12, 2014

The New Deal vs Competing Capitalist Theories


Just as America has been a melting pot of many differing ideals, so too has there always been differing theories about how the economy and interrelation between the social classes should be organized. Economic capitalism, which has been a baseline economic system in the country harkening back to the deeply-rooted tradition of the Protestant Ethic. In theory, this economic system uplifts the American Dream by rewarding those who work hard to earn their wealth and their happiness. However, when systematic failures in the economy, such as the Great Depression, prevent this economic organization from working properly, it soon becomes a question of how wealth should be distributed to those who have been most impacted by a financial crisis and what the relation between the wealthy and the working classes should be and how wealth is distributed between them. Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s theories laid forth in the New Deal doctrines call for a distribution of wealth that allows for the working class and underprivileged to be provided for in times of need or crisis while maintaining the capitalistic spirit and promise of the American Dream. The New Deal theories are preferable to social Darwinist theories like those of William Graham Sumner and anti-capitalistic theories like those of Orestes Brownson, on the grounds that Sumner’s vision does not fully take into account unfair business practices within American capitalism while Brownson fails to juxtapose capitalism with an alternate economic theory that upholds the promise of the American Dream.